Journaltalk - Editor's Choice

Editor's Choice

Browse discussions we have enjoyed! Perceptive, important, contentious discussions— or so it seemed to us!

  1. The Ideological Profile of Harvard University Press: Categorizing 494 Books Published 2000-2010

    • Quick question about cause and effect… I’m sympathetic to the argument here, and the social psychology literature demonstrates, quite well, that we read things more critically when they run counter to our own ideological perspectives, so clearly conservative books would have a more difficult time in the peer review process. However, I’m wondering if Harvard could defend its publication list by arguing that the number of conservative books published is actually proportional to the number of conservatives in academia. I’m noticing, for example, that some of the numbers here seem to mirror data about the number of conservatives in each discipline. So if field X is comprised of 10% conservatives, and 10% of HUP’s publications in that field fall right of center, couldn’t they argue that conservatives have the same chance of being published as liberals? Is there any way to see a sample of submissions and or rejections?
      April Kelly-Woessner

    • 4 comments
    • First comment 24 Jan 2011 by Hal Luft
    • Last comment 16 Feb 2011 by Milo Schield

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

Most recent article-specific discussions at Journaltalk.

29 Sep

Publications, Citations, Position, and Compensation of Economics Professors
Fads and Trends in OECD Economic Thinking on Denmark: A Word-Frequency Approach
Re-examination of the Empirical Evidence Concerning Colonial New Jersey's Paper Money, 1709–1775: A Comment on Farley Grubb
The Liberal Tradition in South Africa, 1910–2019
Lawrence Summers Deserves a Nobel Prize for Reviving the Theory of Secular Stagnation
Adam Smith's Library: General Check-List and Index
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2020 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.