Journaltalk - Editor's Choice

Editor's Choice

Browse discussions we have enjoyed! Perceptive, important, contentious discussions— or so it seemed to us!

  1. The Ideological Profile of Harvard University Press: Categorizing 494 Books Published 2000-2010

    • The percentages in Table 1 are difficult to interpret. There are no 100% totals in this table so we can’t tell if the cell percentages are column percentages or row percentages. With effort, one can determine that all the percentages — except those in the bottom row — are column percentages. Putting 100% totals at the bottom of each column would facilitate understanding. , Showing the prevalence of each subject area could be done in the column titles, in the body or in a separate row below the 100% column totals.
      Figure 1 would have been more useful if the percentages were of “All Ideological HUP Books Surveyed” so the percentages would add to 100%.

    • 4 comments
    • First comment 24 Jan 2011 by Hal Luft
    • Last comment 16 Feb 2011 by Milo Schield

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

Most recent article-specific discussions at Journaltalk.

31 Mar

Lars Magnusson and the Historical Emergence of Economic Liberalism in Sweden
Hello, I'm 1930s America, and I Have a Recovery Problem: A Review of George Selgin's "False Dawn"
Classical Liberalism in Argentina, 1884 to 2023
Reflection after Five Papers about Climate Change
Synthetic Karl Marx and His Clumsy Critic
From Synthetic Marx to Synthetic Kafka: A Rejoinder to Magness and Makovi
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2025 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.