Articles - Journaltalk

Overreaching on Genes

About this article

Abstract

Gregory Clark's To Have and Have Not offers new evidence and his reading of the literature on genetic effects on social status, covering the classical twin and adoption designs, surname-based and extended-kin approaches, and recent work on polygenic scores and genetic nurture. The claim that genes may matter more for socioeconomic outcomes than most social scientists assume deserves to be taken seriously, and the book does point to weaknesses in standard designs that may understate genetic effects. But the book overreaches: its presentation is one-sided, its reading of the literature is selective, and its interpretations are far stronger than the evidence supports. While the patterns Clark documents are intriguing, they merit a more balanced treatment than they receive here.

Author
  • Jan Stuhler
Keywords intergenerational mobility, social status, assortative mating, extended family
Volume Number 23
Issue Number 2
Pages 562–572
File URL Overreaching on Genes
File Format
Access
Publication year 2026

Flag this article

Start the discussion.

Be the first to share your thoughts below.

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don't have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

Jt Article Discussions

Most recent article-specific discussions at Journaltalk.

30 Sep

To Have and Have Not: Response to Commentators
Overreaching on Genes
On Clark's Book on the Determinants of Social Status in England, 1600–2026
Survival of the Richest
For Clark’s Consideration: Genotypic Population Stratification and Non-Additive Genetic Effects
Who’s Afraid of Gregory Clark?
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2026 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.