Articles - Journaltalk

Hume's Manuscript Account of the Extraordinary Affair Between Him and Rousseau

About this article

Author
  • David Hume
Volume Number 18
Issue Number 2
Pages 278–326
File URL Hume's Manuscript Account of the Extraordinary Affair Between Him and Rousseau
File Format
Access
Publication year 2021

Flag this article

Join this discussion.

2 comments

  1. Dear colleagues:

    I’m a Spanish Hume’s scholar and I’m working at that precise moment in the first Spanish edition of CGA by Hume.

    First, many thanks for making public a copy of Hume’s MS at BNS.

    Only a brief comment: in my opinion there is an important change in transcription of the letter of June 23rd because where the original text of MS (page 30) says “c’est vous même” your version says precisely the opposite “I know one man, however, whom you can not deceive; I mean myself.” (your ed. MS, p. 298). The 1766 French original version (p. 47) and the English original version (p. 29) correctly transcribe this text, as the original MS. French and Italian present editions do the same.

    The change I think is very relevant because Rousseau rhetorically depersonalizes Hume, turning him into a third person who attends the accusation process, in astonishment, being at the same time accused, judge and witness. All of this is lost with this transcription from Hume’s original MS.

    This mistaken quote is also repeated at the beginning of the paper by Klein (“To Tolerant England and a Pension from the King: Did Hume Subconsciously Aim to Subvert Rousseau’s Legacy?”).

    I thought it could be of interest for you.

    Yours sincerely,

    José L. Tasset, Professor of A Corunna University, Spain.

    by Jose Tasset

  2. Outstanding, thank you so much Professor Tasset. We are reproducing both pieces in a volume from CL Press, and we are making the correction. The erroneous “I mean myself” is in the 1826 Hume edition, the text of which was used by Project Gutenberg, which is where we lifted the English translations of Rousseau from. Thank you again!

    by Daniel Klein

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don't have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

Jt Article Discussions

Most recent article-specific discussions at Journaltalk.

03 Apr

An Article in Science on Covid Origins Contains a Fundamental Error
Factory Productivity and the Concession System of Incorporation in Late Imperial Russia, 1894–1908: A Comment on Gregg
A Critique of Synthetic Control Method Studies on Covid-19 Policy—Evidence from Sweden
Response to Lychakov’s Comment on My Research on Incorporation in Late Imperial Russia, 1894–1908
A Critique of an Urban Studies Article on the Housing Supply Impact of Land Use Reforms
Online Grocery Shopping in Russia: A Comment on Olumekor, Singh, and Alhamad
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2026 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.