Journaltalk - Hume's Manuscript Account of the Extraordinary Affair Between Him and Rousseau

Hume's Manuscript Account of the Extraordinary Affair Between Him and Rousseau

About this article

Author
  • David Hume
Volume Number 18
Issue Number 2
Pages 278–326
File URL Hume's Manuscript Account of the Extraordinary Affair Between Him and Rousseau
Publication year 2021

Flag this article

Flag this article for moderation.


Close this.

About Econ Journal Watch

Publisher INST SPONTANEOUS ORDER ECONOMICS
Grouping social sciences
Categories economic, economics

Flag this journal

Flag this journal for moderation.


Close this.

Add a comment to this discussion.

1 comments

  1. Dear colleagues:

    I’m a Spanish Hume’s scholar and I’m working at that precise moment in the first Spanish edition of CGA by Hume.

    First, many thanks for making public a copy of Hume’s MS at BNS.

    Only a brief comment: in my opinion there is an important change in transcription of the letter of June 23rd because where the original text of MS (page 30) says “c’est vous même” your version says precisely the opposite “I know one man, however, whom you can not deceive; I mean myself.” (your ed. MS, p. 298). The 1766 French original version (p. 47) and the English original version (p. 29) correctly transcribe this text, as the original MS. French and Italian present editions do the same.

    The change I think is very relevant because Rousseau rhetorically depersonalizes Hume, turning him into a third person who attends the accusation process, in astonishment, being at the same time accused, judge and witness. All of this is lost with this transcription from Hume’s original MS.

    This mistaken quote is also repeated at the beginning of the paper by Klein (“To Tolerant England and a Pension from the King: Did Hume Subconsciously Aim to Subvert Rousseau’s Legacy?”).

    I thought it could be of interest for you.

    Yours sincerely,
    José L. Tasset, Professor of A Corunna University, Spain.

    posted 28 Dec 2021 by Jose Tasset

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don’t have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

01 Oct

To Tolerant England and a Pension from the King: Did Hume Subconsciously Aim to Subvert Rousseau's Legacy?
Hume's Manuscript Account of the Extraordinary Affair Between Him and Rousseau

30 Sep

The General Directing of Trade Cannot Be a Science: D'Argenson's 1751 Commentary Essay and the Response to It
Classical Liberalism in Finland in the Nineteenth Century
Rejoinder to the Critique of an Article on Machine Learning in the Detection of Accounting Fraud
Response to “Mortality and Science: A Comment on Two Articles on the Effects of Health Insurance on Mortality”
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2022 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.