Journaltalk - Big Questions and Poor Economics: Banerjee and Duflo on Schooling in Developing Countries

Big Questions and Poor Economics: Banerjee and Duflo on Schooling in Developing Countries

About this article

Author
  • James Tooley
Keywords Education, private schools, private education, development, developing countries
Volume Number 9
Issue Number 3
Pages 170-185
File URL Big Questions and Poor Economics: Banerjee and Duflo on Schooling in Developing Countries
Publication year 2012

Flag this article

Flag this article for moderation.


Close this.

About Econ Journal Watch

Publisher INST SPONTANEOUS ORDER ECONOMICS
Grouping social sciences
Categories economic, economics

Flag this journal

Flag this journal for moderation.


Close this.

Add a comment to this discussion.

1 comments

  1. I certainly see this same pattern among randomista researchers in studies on interventions to improve access to and/or quality of health services and products .

    The need to answer “big questions” or, pretend to policy relevance (and levels of external validity RCT they lack) means that RCT papers in health very frequently have conclusions that go (way) past the statistical findings. And to generate these conclusions, researchers mostly just pull up some scattered references to support their own biases.

    A common one in health is: our analysis confirms that demand curves slope downward…SO government should provide (whatever) for free through it’s facilities/ supply system. So, similar to what James outlines wrt the Poor Econ chapter and education RCTs, there is a huge leap from the studies’ findings to policy prescriptions – and similarly manifesting a public-sector-solution centric view of the world (not to mention ignoring scarcity of resources…perhaps an even worse sin for economists!).
    Thanks James for taking the time to elaborate these issues.

    posted 27 Sep 2012 by April Harding

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don’t have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

01 Oct

What 21st-Century Works Will Merit a Close Reading in 2050?: First Tranche of Responses
The Errors of Historicism in German Economics
Liberalism in Brazil
Republicans Need Not Apply: An Investigation of the American Economic Association Using Voter Registration and Political Contributions
Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination
Gender, Race and Ethnicity, and Inequality Research in the <em>American Economic Review</em> and the American Economic Association’s Conference Papers
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2020 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.