Journaltalk - Big Questions and Poor Economics: Banerjee and Duflo on Schooling in Developing Countries

Big Questions and Poor Economics: Banerjee and Duflo on Schooling in Developing Countries

About this article

  • James Tooley
Keywords Education, private schools, private education, development, developing countries
Volume Number 9
Issue Number 3
Pages 170-185
File URL Big Questions and Poor Economics: Banerjee and Duflo on Schooling in Developing Countries
Publication year 2012

Flag this article

Flag this article for moderation.

Close this.

About Econ Journal Watch

Grouping social sciences
Categories economic, economics

Flag this journal

Flag this journal for moderation.

Close this.

Add a comment to this discussion.


  1. I certainly see this same pattern among randomista researchers in studies on interventions to improve access to and/or quality of health services and products .

    The need to answer “big questions” or, pretend to policy relevance (and levels of external validity RCT they lack) means that RCT papers in health very frequently have conclusions that go (way) past the statistical findings. And to generate these conclusions, researchers mostly just pull up some scattered references to support their own biases.

    A common one in health is: our analysis confirms that demand curves slope downward…SO government should provide (whatever) for free through it’s facilities/ supply system. So, similar to what James outlines wrt the Poor Econ chapter and education RCTs, there is a huge leap from the studies’ findings to policy prescriptions – and similarly manifesting a public-sector-solution centric view of the world (not to mention ignoring scarcity of resources…perhaps an even worse sin for economists!).
    Thanks James for taking the time to elaborate these issues.

    posted 27 Sep 2012 by April Harding

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don’t have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.


Log in to Your Account

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

01 Oct

To Tolerant England and a Pension from the King: Did Hume Subconsciously Aim to Subvert Rousseau's Legacy?
Hume's Manuscript Account of the Extraordinary Affair Between Him and Rousseau

30 Sep

The General Directing of Trade Cannot Be a Science: D'Argenson's 1751 Commentary Essay and the Response to It
Classical Liberalism in Finland in the Nineteenth Century
Rejoinder to the Critique of an Article on Machine Learning in the Detection of Accounting Fraud
Response to “Mortality and Science: A Comment on Two Articles on the Effects of Health Insurance on Mortality”
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2021 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.