Journaltalk - We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer

We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer

About this article

Author
  • Stephen T. Ziliak and Deirdre N. McCloskey
Keywords Significance test, economic significance, Student’s t, oomph, Gosset, Fisher
Volume Number 10
Issue Number 1
Pages 97-107
File URL We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer
Publication year 2013

Flag this article

Flag this article for moderation.

Close this.

About Econ Journal Watch

Publisher INST SPONTANEOUS ORDER ECONOMICS
Grouping social sciences
Categories economic, economics

Flag this journal

Flag this journal for moderation.

Close this.

Discuss this

Be the first to review this item.

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don’t have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

28 May

The Meaning of Competition
My Understanding of Adam Smith's Impartial Spectator
The Logic of Reflection: Spectators Partial and Impartial
The Fair and Impartial Spectator
Peer Review and the Development of the Impartial Spectator

27 May

Is Adam Smith's Impartial Spectator Selfless?
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2016 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.