Journaltalk - We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer

We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer

About this article

Author
  • Stephen T. Ziliak and Deirdre N. McCloskey
Keywords Significance test, economic significance, Student’s t, oomph, Gosset, Fisher
Volume Number 10
Issue Number 1
Pages 97-107
File URL We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer
Publication year 2013

Flag this article

Flag this article for moderation.

Close this.

About Econ Journal Watch

Publisher INST SPONTANEOUS ORDER ECONOMICS
Grouping social sciences
Categories economic, economics

Flag this journal

Flag this journal for moderation.

Close this.

Discuss this

Be the first to review this item.

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don’t have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

31 May

My Most Regretted Statements [symposium]
Liberalism in Iceland in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries

30 May

Classical Liberalism in China: Some History and Prospects
Economics Doctoral Programs Still Elide Entrepreneurship
Response to Jeffrey Rogers Hummel's Review of "The Curse of Cash"
The War on Cash: A Review of Kenneth Rogoff's "The Curse of Cash"
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2017 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.