Journaltalk - We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer

We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer

About this article

Author
  • Stephen T. Ziliak and Deirdre N. McCloskey
Keywords Significance test, economic significance, Student’s t, oomph, Gosset, Fisher
Volume Number 10
Issue Number 1
Pages 97-107
File URL We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer
Publication year 2013

Flag this article

Flag this article for moderation.

Close this.

About Econ Journal Watch

Publisher INST SPONTANEOUS ORDER ECONOMICS
Grouping social sciences
Categories economic, economics

Flag this journal

Flag this journal for moderation.

Close this.

Discuss this

Be the first to review this item.

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don’t have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

14 Sep

Capitalism and the Rule of Love
Does Occupational Licensing Deserve Our Approval? A Review of Work by Morris Kleiner
A Reply to Olav Bjerkholt on the Postwar Norwegian Economy
Ragnar Frisch and the Postwar Norwegian Economy: A Critical Comment on Sæther and Eriksen
Saying Too Little, Too Late: Public Finance Textbooks and the Excess Burdens of Taxation
Replicability and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Resampled Data: A Correction and a Randomization Test for Anwar and Fang
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2014 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.