Articles - Journaltalk

Dropping the Geographic-Constraints Variable Makes Only a Minor Difference: Reply to Cox

About this article

Abstract

Cox (2010) raises the concern that the regressions in Huang and Tang (2010) may underestimate the effect of regulations on housing prices by including both a measure of geographic constraints and a measure of regulatory constraints on the right-hand side. We respond that omitting geographic constraints in our regressions may overestimate the effect of regulations. Empirically, we show that removing the geography variable from our regressions causes only minor increases in the estimated effects of regulation.

Author
  • Haifang Huang
  • Yao Tang
Volume Number 8
Issue Number 1
Pages 28-32
File URL Dropping the Geographic-Constraints Variable Makes Only a Minor Difference: Reply to Cox
File Format
Access
Publication year 2011

Flag this article

Start the discussion.

Be the first to share your thoughts below.

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don't have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

Jt Article Discussions

Most recent article-specific discussions at Journaltalk.

03 Apr

A Critique of an Urban Studies Article on the Housing Supply Impact of Land Use Reforms
Online Grocery Shopping in Russia: A Comment on Olumekor, Singh, and Alhamad
Reply to “A Critique of an Urban Studies Article on the Housing Supply Impact of Land Use Reforms”
Reflection after Five Papers about Climate Change
The Impartial Spectator Rises
Power Analysis is Essential: High-Powered Tests Suggest Minimal to No Effect of Rounded Shapes on Click-Through Rates
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2026 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.