Journaltalk - Dropping the Geographic-Constraints Variable Makes Only a Minor Difference: Reply to Cox

Dropping the Geographic-Constraints Variable Makes Only a Minor Difference: Reply to Cox

About this article

Abstract

Cox (2010) raises the concern that the regressions in Huang and Tang (2010) may underestimate the effect of regulations on housing prices by including both a measure of geographic constraints and a measure of regulatory constraints on the right-hand side. We respond that omitting geographic constraints in our regressions may overestimate the effect of regulations. Empirically, we show that removing the geography variable from our regressions causes only minor increases in the estimated effects of regulation.

Author
  • Haifang Huang
  • Yao Tang
Volume Number 8
Issue Number 1
Pages 28-32
File URL Dropping the Geographic-Constraints Variable Makes Only a Minor Difference: Reply to Cox
File Format PDF
Access no registration, free access
Publication year 2011

Flag this article

Flag this article for moderation.

Close this.

About Econ Journal Watch

Publisher INST SPONTANEOUS ORDER ECONOMICS
Grouping social sciences
Categories economic, economics

Flag this journal

Flag this journal for moderation.

Close this.

Discuss this

Be the first to review this item.

Log in to Journaltalk to discuss this article!

Don’t have a Journaltools account? Sign up now.

Required

Log in to Your Account

Member login

feed Jt Article Discussions

28 May

The Meaning of Competition
My Understanding of Adam Smith's Impartial Spectator
The Logic of Reflection: Spectators Partial and Impartial
The Fair and Impartial Spectator
Peer Review and the Development of the Impartial Spectator

27 May

Is Adam Smith's Impartial Spectator Selfless?
Journaltalk: Opening the journals to civil voices everywhere!

All contents © 2016 by Daniel Klein unless otherwise attributed. All rights reserved.